Abstract

Hans Frank did not have typical entitlement to administrative supervision over the justice system, but the competences discussed in the articles made it possible for him to influence personally the justice system and its functioning. The most important seem to be legislative prerogatives. Due to them the General Governor directly influenced the rulings both in civil and most of all in criminal proceedings. The progressive repressive character of criminal law in the General Government during World War II was his responsibility. His competences seem to be of political system character: he issued regulations forming the structure of German courts, reorganizing the structure of Polish courts. His prerogative of mercy enabled him to revise court rulings. However the General Governor took successive decisions concerning the restriction of his personal competences in this area. On the other hand he undertook intervention in particular court cases, although he did not have formal foundations for it (here the model pattern could be Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler’s personal interventions). His inconsistent behaviour in this sphere may be understood in the context of his features of character. Dieter Schenk’s opinion that the main feature of his character was megalomania, inconsistent behaviour, lack of self-discipline, overemphasising his own abilities, using pompous expressions, laziness, vanity and chaos in making decisions, can be shared.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.