Abstract
AbstractIn this research work, we propose three schemes: neighbor node approaching distinct energy‐efficient mates (NADEEM), fallback approach NADEEM (FA‐NADEEM), and transmission adjustment NADEEM (TA‐NADEEM). In NADEEM, immutable forwarder node selection is avoided with the help of three distinct selection parameters. Void hole is avoided using a fallback recovery mechanism to deliver data successfully at the destination. The transmission range is dynamically adjusted to resume greedy forwarding among the network nodes. The neighbor node is only eligible to become forwarder when it is not a void node. Additionally, linear programming–based feasible regions are computed for an optimal energy dissipation and network throughput improvement. Extensive simulations are conducted for three parameters: energy, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and fraction of void nodes. Further, an analysis is performed by varying transmission range and data rate for energy consumption and fraction of void node. The results clearly depict that our proposed schemes outperform the baseline scheme (GEDAR) in terms of energy consumption and fraction of void nodes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
