Abstract
Two setups are used to investigate differences between modeling a wind turbine nacelle by means of an actuator-line model (ALM) and a wall-model (WM) using large-eddy simulations. One advantage of the ALM is that it requires a lower mesh refinement, making it less computationally costly. In the first setup, the nacelle is in standalone configuration and the ALM results show a much lower turbulence intensity and a significantly slower wake recovery when compared to the WM cases. In the second setup, the nacelle is in a rotor-nacelle assembly configuration and many variations of the ALM are tested in order to match the results from the experiment addressed in the OC6 task phase III. Contrary to previous findings that the nacelle might affect the turbine loads, this study shows that the improved match with the experiment stems from the increased mesh refinement in the nacelle region rather than the actual presence of the nacelle. Nevertheless, the wake profiles in the near-wake show a very good agreement between the ALM and WM, regardless of the refinement in the nacelle region. These cases also show a higher wake deficit than not using any nacelle at all.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
