Abstract
The paper considers those positive moments that were achieved in the works of N.S. Trubetskoi in morphonology, as well as the disadvantages that did not allow morphonology to be distinguished as an independent linguistic discipline. The views of N.S. Trubetskoi were further developed by the Prague Linguistic School. However, they failed to resolve the issue of the independent status of morphonology as a linguistic discipline, although they tried to single out independent morphonological units – morphoneme and alternant. KEY WORDS: morphonology, alternant, alternation, morphoneme.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
