Abstract
Stern's observations on some major topics in development economics are examined, notably his interpretation of the hypothesis of the vicious circle of poverty, as well as his observations on the extent, movement and measurement of international income differences, the implications of central planning, and the effects of development aid. Issues of both substance and method are examined. The inadequacies of some leading ideas of development economics, defended by Stern, are considered. Significant instances of inappropriate aggregation and quantification are noted, as well as some results of the treatment as parameters of factors which are regarded appropriately as variables. Problems of assessing evidence, including assessment of the effects of policies, are also discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
