Abstract

本文比对了黑龙江漠河中俄输油管道2014年1月1日至2017年4月30日期间进口俄罗斯原油中硫含量检验的中俄双方口岸的实验结果,研究了俄罗斯原油检验ГОSТ国家标准和我国原油检验GB国家标准的差异性。根据俄方ГОSТ标准和中方GB标准通过3年多的对比试验,发现采用俄方ГОSТ标准和中国GB标准测定原油中硫含量的检验结果存在系统性偏差,研究了原油中硫含量的中俄双方检验结果的变化规律及相对误差,为中俄原油贸易谈判和争端的解决提供了依据,为中俄总理定期会晤委员会经贸合作分委会的标准计量认证和检验监管常设工作组能源计量分组的四次会谈提供了技术支撑。 This paper, through experiments, compared the inspection of sulfur content (%) in imported Rus-sian crude oil in Heilongjiang Mohe Sino-Russian oil pipeline, the experimental test results of Chi-na-Russia both sides of the port during January 1st in 2014-April 30th in 2017, and researched the differences between the two matrix of experimental results determined by the ГОCТ standard and GB standard of crude oil. According to comparative test which based on ГОSТ standard and GB standard method in recent three years, we found that the results of the sulfur content (%) of crude oil imported from Russian detected by ГОSТ standard and GB standard existed clearly systematic deviation. In order to provide the settlements of trade negotiation and dispute in international oil, the variation of the test results of the crude oil sulfur content (%) and the relative error were studied. Meanwhile the study provides the technical support for the four meetings of the Energy Metric Subgroup of the Standing Committee on Standardization Certification and Inspection of the Subcommittee on Economic and Trade Cooperation between the Chinese and Russian Prime Min-isters’ Regular Meetings Committee.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call