Abstract
Data was collected retrospectively on 72 patients with lower cervical spine injury treated in our Institues. Fifty two patients were treated surgically and twenty treated nonsurgically. At final follow-up no significant difference in neurological recovery was noted between patients treated surgically and those treated nonsurgically. We concluded that the timing of the operation was not effective and that the type of spinal cord injury was the most important prognoshe factor in tems of neurological recovery.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
