Abstract
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.As modern bioethical consumers, we are responsible for developing positive solutions to the discipline’s identity crisis. In many cases, “four-principles” bioethics offers a guide for cross-cultural debate. Optimism is crucial for distinguishing specific moral rules and ultimate moral principles. The observations on which Professor Solomon’s theory is based do not demonstrate that the basic ethical principles of bioethics are culture-bound, merely that specific ethical rules are culture-bound.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 87 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.
Highlights
“Rationality” in M Hollis and S Lukes eds., Rationality and Relativism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982).
“Bioethics and Culture: Understanding the Contemporary Crisis in Bioethics,” International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine, XII:2 (2014), pp.87-117.
Summary
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
