Abstract

PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒 基于生态足迹方法的南京可持续发展研究 DOI: 10.5846/stxb201107281104 作者: 作者单位: 南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京师范大学地理科学学院 作者简介: 通讯作者: 中图分类号: 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41271128);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目(地理学);江苏省高校自然科学基础研究项目(11KJB170003) Study on sustainable development in nanjing based on ecological footprint model Author: Affiliation: Nanjing Normal Univesity,Nanjing Normal Univesity Fund Project: 摘要 | 图/表 | 访问统计 | 参考文献 | 相似文献 | 引证文献 | 资源附件 | 文章评论 摘要:20世纪90年代末以来,随着南京城市化进程的加快和城市建成区面积的扩展,城市生态安全问题日益突出。在运用生态足迹方法分析南京市1999-2009年人均生态足迹及生态承载力变化的基础上,采用Mann-kendall法对南京市人均生态足迹突变点进行分析,应用灰色关联模型从经济、社会和生态子系统方面分析不同阶段人均生态足迹变化的原因。研究表明:1999-2009年间南京市人均生态足迹呈增长趋势,人均生态承载力呈减小趋势,单位万元GDP生态足迹和生态多样性指数呈逐年下降趋势,生态经济系统发展能力较好,但生态压力较大。南京市人均生态足迹变化分为1999-2002年的低位增长阶段和2003-2009年高位波动阶段。通过影响南京市生态足迹变化因素分析发现,2003-2009年与1999-2002年相比,经济子系统依然处于主要地位,但影响因素由农业向以三产为主转变,同时生态子系统和社会子系统各因素的影响力提升。据此,提出优化产业结构,控制人口数量,加强基础设施建设,改善居民居住环境,加大城市绿化建设,提高城市污物处理能力,减少污染物排放的南京可持续发展对策。 Abstract:With economic development and population growth occurring throughout China, there has been increasing conflict between resources, environmental protection and economic development in a number of regions. Therefore, it is important to correctly evaluate the pressure of human activities on the natural environment and the ecosystem carrying capacity at a regional scale. The ecological footprint model has received much attention as an indicator of regional sustainable development. Recent studies investigating the ecological footprint of regions in China have focused on the city of Nanjing, due to the speed of urbanization and the rate at which built-up areas are expanding in the city. Thus, based on the ecological footprint model to study per capita ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity in Nanjing from 1999-2009, this paper applied the Mann-Kendall method to analyze the abrupt change point of per capita ecological footprint in Nanjing. The Mann-Kendall method is a non-parametric statistical test, which has the advantages of a wide range of detection, a small human impact and a high degree of quantification. In light of three subsystems-economic, social and ecological-we selected 14 indices and employed the gray indigence method to explore the reasons of per capita ecological footprint variation in Nanjing between the two different phases, from 1999-2002 and from 2003-2009. The results show that during the period between 1999-2009, per capita ecological footprint generally grew; the change of per capita ecological capacity and per capita ecological deficit had a decreasing trend; the unit of 10,000 in GDP's ecological footprint and ecological diversity index dropped gradually; the eco-ecological system development capacity improved; but ecological pressure remained significant. The variation of per capita ecological footprint in Nanjing is divided into two stages: low-level growth stage, which is from 1999-2002, and high-level fluctuation stage, which is from 2003-2009. From 1999-2002, the main factors influencing per capita ecological footprint were the primary industry production value, population density, and the green coverage rate of built-up areas. While from 2003-2009, the main factors influencing per capita ecological footprint were the proportion of tertiary industry production value in GDP, rate of sewage treatment, and per capita greening area. Through comparative analysis on the ecological footprint evolution of different phases in Nanjing-from 2003-2009 and from 1999-2002-we found that the economic subsystem was still acting as the main function, but the main influencing factor had transformed from agriculture to tertiary industry. At the same time, the influences of the ecological and social subsystems had been upgraded because the degree of correlation between per capita ecological footprint and various evaluation indices (per capita housing living space and population density in social subsystem, rate of sewage treatment reflecting treatment ability of waste, and per capita greening area reflecting the level of greening in ecological subsystem) had increased. In addition to our findings, we propose a suite of sustainable development policies that aim to help in optimizing industrial structure, controlling the population, strengthening infrastructure construction, improving the resident-inhabited environment, increasing the construction of urban greening, improving the capacity of dealing with pollutants, and decreasing pollutant discharge. 参考文献 相似文献 引证文献

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.