Abstract
To investigate the clinical usefulness of coronary arteriography using a gadolinium contrast medium (hereinafter referred to as Gd contrast medium) in patients with iodine allergy, images obtained using an iodinated contrast medium and a Gd contrast medium were compared using respective phantoms. Within the range of the effective energy (34.8 to 41.0 keV) in clinical use, the tube-voltage dependency of the Gd contrast medium was lower than that of the iodinated contrast medium. The contrast ratios were found to be comparable for the images obtained by a 4-fold-diluted iodinated contrast medium and the undiluted Gd contrast medium. Although the assessment of stenotic ratio was difficult to obtain by visual evaluation of the clinical images, due to unclear borders of the blood vessels, the presence or absence of significant stenosis was discriminative by arteriography using the Gd contrast medium. Based on these findings, it was considered necessary to make a confirmed diagnosis using a Gd contrast medium with concurrent diagnosis by intravascular echography. In conclusion, coronary arteriography and PCI using a Gd contrast medium are considered to offer benefit to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with iodine allergy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
