Abstract

A hypothetical proposition is stated that mythologization of objects in M. Garetsky’s works is a way to harmonize the surrounding world and man in it, and also a precise picture of the reality, a sign of changes and calamities.In accordance with M. Garetsky’s mythopoetical concept, the tragic spirit of human life is vivid in simultaneous personi­ fication of objects and objectivation of people; it is revealed in such moments as hiding face (“Winter”), or partial identification of man with clothes (“Guiet current”). Complete and irrevocable objectivation of man is presented by the author in the story “Winter” and the novel “Guiet current”.In the story “Winter” the central place, or a scene where objects attack man is a mythological image of a house, which fulfills various content and conceptual functions in the author’s mythmaking. On the one hand, the house is a protective hearth, which gives man complete protection, like in the stories “In a Sauna”, “Native Root”. On the other hand, it is a place of uncomfortable and constrained human life.It is stressed that in M. Garetsky’s descriptions we see a transition from life precision to dethronement of social myth. There is a similar fine line between life plane and myth in the story “In a Sauna”, but this work, unlike the story “Tar”, depicts not destruction of myth, but its growth and reinforcement, which is symbolically revealed in sentences and in magical charms (the story “Winter”).

Highlights

  • In the story “Winter” the central place, or a scene where objects attack man is a mythological image of a house, which fulfills various content and conceptual functions in the author’s mythmaking

  • There is a similar fine line between life plane and myth in the story “In a Sauna”, but this work, unlike the story “Tar”, depicts not destruction of myth, but its growth and reinforcement, which is symbolically revealed in sentences and in magical charms

  • Перадаецца праз адухаўленне прадметаў, рэчаў і адначасова праз арэчаўленне людзей, што праявілася ў такіх момантах міфапаэтыкі, як схаванне твару (апавяданне “Зіма”) або частковае атаясамліванне вопраткі і чалавека (аповесць “Ціхая плынь”)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

З аднаго боку, гэта спосаб гарманізацыі навакольнага свету і чалавека ў ім, а з другога – дакладны малюнак рэчаіснасці, знак зрухаў і катастроф. Дзе шырока асвятляюцца пытанні канца свету, і пісьменнік спыняе рух дзеяння натуралістычнымі ўстаўкамі, дэталёвым паказам прадметаў і рэчаў, якія прадстаўляюць той унутраны свет, які нясе ў сабе чалавек наперакор апакаліпсісу эпохі. Усе вышэйназваныя фрагменты ваўкалакства выразна сведчаць аб тым, што ў творах беларускай літаратуры ХІХ – пачатку ХХ стагоддзя захаваліся архаічныя ўяўленні аб адзінстве прыроды і чалавека, калі была моцнай вера ў татэмічную жывёлу, якая заўсёды магла абараніць чалавека.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call