Abstract

The stiffness of the myosin cross-bridges is a key factor in analysing possible scenarios to explain myosin head changes during force generation in active muscles. The seminal study of Huxley and Simmons (1971: Nature 233: 533) suggested that most of the observed half-sarcomere instantaneous compliance (=1/stiffness) resides in the myosin heads. They showed with a so-called T1 plot that, after a very fast release, the half-sarcomere tension reduced to zero after a step size of about 60Å (later with improved experiments reduced to 40Å). However, later X-ray diffraction studies showed that myosin and actin filaments themselves stretch slightly under tension, which means that most (at least two-thirds) of the half sarcomere compliance comes from the filaments and not from cross-bridges. Here we have used a different approach, namely to model the compliances in a virtual half sarcomere structure in silico. We confirm that the T1 curve comes almost entirely from length changes in the myosin and actin filaments, because the calculated cross-bridge stiffness (probably greater than 0.4 pN/Å) is higher than previous studies have suggested. Our model demonstrates that the formulations produced by previous authors give very similar results to our model if the same starting parameters are used. However, we find that it is necessary to model the X-ray diffraction data as well as mechanics data to get a reliable estimate of the cross-bridge stiffness. In the light of the high cross-bridge stiffness found in the present study, we present a plausible modified scenario to describe aspects of the myosin cross-bridge cycle in active muscle. In particular, we suggest that, apart from the filament compliances, most of the cross-bridge contribution to the instantaneous T1 response may come from weakly-bound myosin heads, not myosin heads in strongly attached states. The strongly attached heads would still contribute to the T1 curve, but only in a very minor way, with a stiffness that we postulate could be around 0.1 pN/Å, a value which would generate a working stroke close to 100 Å from the hydrolysis of one ATP molecule. The new model can serve as a tool to calculate sarcomere elastic properties for any vertebrate striated muscle once various parameters have been determined (e.g., tension, T1 intercept, temperature, X-ray diffraction spacing results).

Highlights

  • Following the insight of Huxley [1] about the way force might be produced in muscle, Huxley and Simmons [2] carried out mechanical studies of frog muscle fibres subjected to rapid mechanical transients and found results that they thought the Huxley [1] scheme would not explain

  • Model 2: This was an exact calculation once the starting parameters have been defined based on a more detailed in silico mechanical model than Model 1, but with a crosslink representing several myosin heads bridging to actin on every 143 Å crown repeat

  • We believe that our new models are already more sophisticated and accurate than anything previously published on the T1 curve, and, since the programs have been tested against previous calculations in Appendices D and E, where we show that the same results are obtained if the same starting parameters are used, the X-ray diffraction evidence, we are confident that the new modelling is providing useful results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Following the insight of Huxley [1] about the way force might be produced in muscle, Huxley and Simmons [2] carried out mechanical studies of frog muscle fibres subjected to rapid mechanical transients (shortening and lengthening) and found results that they thought the Huxley [1] scheme would not explain Part of what they did was to apply very rapid shortening steps, complete within about 1.0 ms, to an active fibre (Figure 1a), reducing the muscle sarcomere length by various steps in the nm range, and observing the tension recovery after each step. They showed (Figure 1c) that their observed T1 and T2 curves appeared to scale directly with the amount of overlap between the myosin and actin filaments, a result which seemed to confirm that the T1 and T2 curves were solely revealing properties of independently acting, actin-attached, myosin cross-bridges

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call