Abstract

To evaluate refractive results and the theoretical elastic response of photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with asymmetrical corneal surface and to compare such outcomes with a control-matched group of normal topographies. Retrospective interventional case series with matched comparison group. Thirty eyes with superior-inferior dioptric difference (SI index) > 1.40 diopter (D) were compared to 30 eyes with normal topographies. Bothgroups were matched for age, preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), mean keratometry, and percentage of tissue altered (PTA). Refractive results and the theoretical elastic modulus calculations were evaluated. The mean preoperative SI index in the asymmetrical group was 2.06 ± 0.56 D vs 0.14 ± 0.73 D in the control group (P < .001). From 3 to 12months postoperatively, the asymmetrical group presented a mean re-steepening of 0.51 ± 0.39 D vs 0.19 ± 0.40 D in the control group (P= .014). The mean PTA of14.42% generated a theoretical elastic modulus reduction of 10.25% in the asymmetrical group vs 2.45% in the control group (P= .006). The reduction of the theoretical elastic modulus correlated with thepreoperative SI index (ρ=-0.387, P= .007). After 36months, 90% of all eyes were within ±0.50D of SEand the theoretical elastic modulus did not presentasignificant difference between both groups(P= .085). Asymmetrical-topography corneas treated with myopic surface ablation presented an increased short-term keratometric re-steepening and reduction of the theoretical elastic moduli. The long-term follow-up indicated that, in selected cases of asymmetrical topographies, myopic surface ablation could induce a premature biomechanical elastic response ratherthan a progressive pathologic process.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.