Myocardial work and left atrial function, by speckle tracking echocardiography, are the only independent predictors of mid-term mortality in HFpEF

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by 2 National grants of Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation - UEFISCDI (PN-III-P1-1-TE-2016-0669, acronym Heart-Preserved and PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI2017-0527, acronym BIOVEA). OnBehalf HEART-PRESERVED Background. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), defined by the 2021 ESC guidelines and the new universal definition, is one of the most challenging diagnosis in cardiology. Parameters for predicting mortality in HFpEF are still debatable. Left atrial (LA) function and myocardial work (MW) by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) might be promising tools for predicting mortality in HFpEF. Methods. We assessed 88 patients (67 ± 9 years, 33 men) with HFpEF (mean NTproBNP of 357 ± 350 pg/ml) by 2D echo, STE, and CMR. By echo we measured LV ejection fraction (LVEF), E/E’, sPAP, left atrial volume indexed (LAVi), and global longitudinal strain (GLS). We assessed LA function by 2DSTE: reservoir function by strain from MVC to MVO (LASr) and positive strain rate (LASRr), conduit function by strain from MVO to onset of atrial contraction (LAScd) and early negative strain rate during conduit phase (LASRcd), and LA pump function by negative strain at MVC (LASct) and late negative strain rate during atrial contraction phase (LASRct) (Figure 1); and MW by 2DSTE: global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE), as GCW/(GCW + GWW) in %. By CMR we evaluated LVEFcmr, LV mass, T1 mapping with mean extracellular volume (ECVm), and pre-gadolinium times quantification (preGDT1m) as markers of myocardial fibrosis. A follow-up visit for cardiovascular mortality was performed by phone at 18 months from the baseline visit. Results. 12 patients died during follow-up (14%). Comparing non-survivors vs. survivors (see tables from Figure 2), NTproBNP level and LV mass were significantly higher in non-survivors (P < 0.001); meanwhile, GWE was lower, whereas GWW was higher in non-survivors vs. survivors. Moreover, LASRct was lower in non-survivors vs. survivors. All the other echo or CMR parameters, including markers of myocardial fibrosis were not different between non-survivors and survivors (Figure 2). By multiple regression analysis, GWE < 92% (AUC = 0.72, p = 0.018) and LASRct <-1 (AUC = 0.70, p = 0.014) were the only independent predictors of mortality, from all conventional echo, STE, and CMR parameters. Conclusions LV assessment by myocardial work and LA assessment by STE are the only independent predictors of mid-term mortality in HFpEF. Abstract Figure. LA deformation analysis Abstract Figure. Survivors vs non-survivors