Abstract
Methods This meta-analysis was performed in adherence to the PRISMA statement. Two reviewers systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science, using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only studies using invasive coronary angiography combined with FFR for assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses were included. The QUADAS-2 criteria were applied for quality appraisal. A random-effects model was used for computing pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and the diagnostic odds ratio. Analyses were performed on both vessel and patient levels.
Highlights
Myocardial perfusion MRI is a technique that allows for detection myocardial ischemia
Myocardial perfusion MRI compared to fractional flow reserve: a meta-analysis
The goal of this meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Myocardial perfusion MRI compared to fractional flow reserve (FFR) for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis
Summary
Myocardial perfusion MRI is a technique that allows for detection myocardial ischemia. The goal of this meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Myocardial perfusion MRI compared to fractional flow reserve (FFR) for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
