Abstract

Cardiac enzyme elevation after radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFL) is common. Some studies found that cryoablation (CRYO) of AFL, compared to RF, is associated with higher levels of troponin, a finding that may indicate CRYO causes a greater amount of myocardial injury than RF. However, other investigations found no significant differences between troponin levels after CRYO versus RF. We have in a randomized study compared the post-procedural troponin I levels in RF and CRYO and the possible relation to procedural outcome and complications. We randomized 153 patients with cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent AFL to CRYO or RF (78 CRYO; 75 RF). RF was performed with a 3.5-mm open-irrigated-tip catheter, and CRYO was performed with an 8-mm-tip catheter. Troponin I levels were measured before and 6h after ablation. Acute procedural success was achieved in 71/75 patients in the RF and in 72/78 patients in the CRYO. Troponin I levels were significantly elevated in both groups (baseline 0.012, 6th hour 0.35ng/ml; p < 0.001). Troponin I levels were similar for RF and CRYO. Troponin I levels were higher in patients with acute failure compared to patients with acute success (0.48 ± 0.4 and 0.34 ± 0.16ng/ml, p = 0.029); however, there was no difference between patients with or without late recurrence. There were no major complications in any group. RF and CRYO for CTI-dependent AFL resulted in similar amounts of procedural myocardial injury. Troponin I levels had no prognostic value for late recurrence of AFL and there were no complications related to high troponin I levels.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.