Abstract

Over last ten years critics have focused increasingly on role of Caribbean in William Faulkner's fiction. According to John T. Matthews, this recent interest in West Indian component of Faulkner's works has served to uncover long-neglected connections between new world histories and experiences (239). For example, several critical studies have centered upon complex relationship between U.S. South and island of Haiti in Faulkner's 1936 modernist novel Absalom!, reconfiguring imaginative geography of Faulkner's South as a kind of Caribbean rimlands. In Absalom, Absalom!, Haiti and Labor History: Reading Unreadable Revolutions, Richard Godden reads Haitian dimension of Faulkner's narrative as a direct and powerful comment upon practice of southern slavery in nineteenth-century America. Godden argues that Haitian slave rebellion of 1791 and subsequent establishment of Western hemisphere's first black independent nation in 1804 transformed Haiti into U.S. slaveholders' worst nightmare; in Absalom!, Haiti shadows Faulkner's plantation South as a haunting threat synonymous with revolution (686). Haitian presence in Faulkner's novel has also been analyzed in terms of its relevance to issues of early twentieth-century U.S. empire. In The Hidden Caribbean 'Other' in William Faulkner's Absalom!: An Ideological Ancestry of U.S. Maritza Stanchich asserts that black island nation, held under U.S. military rule from 1915-1934, emerges in Faulkner's novel as an imperialist representation of Caribbean. Through descriptions of the marginal, unnamed, assumed, but nonetheless useful presence of Caribbean, one can glean imperial designs of Faulkner's own generation in West Indies (605). According to Barbara Ladd, America's imperial interests in Haiti can be discerned most directly in Faulkner's novel through puzzling and phantasmal character of Charles Bon, who is born there and becomes increasingly associated in novel with nation of Haiti. Ladd interprets America's early twentieth-century imperial engagement in Caribbean directly through 1910 narrators' reconstruction (542) of Charles Bon and his black island origins. In this essay, I build upon Stanchich's and Ladd's examinations of early twentieth-century U.S. imperialist representations of Haiti in Absalom!. I further assert that Faulkner's novel thematically foregrounds designs of early twentieth-century American empire toward Haiti through historically prevalent discourse of paternalism. According to historian Mary A. Renda, paternalism served as primary discursive mechanism that enabled American invasion and takeover of Haiti for nineteen years. In Taking Haiti: Military Occupation and Culture of U.S. Imperialism, 1915-1940, Renda examines a range of cultural artifacts including imperial documents, Marines' magazines, soldiers' memoirs, and best-selling novels, to show how early twentieth-century Americans were encouraged to envision Haiti's black island nation as a fatherless child in need of stern paternal guidance from United States (250). Extending Renda's claims to Faulkner's novel, I argue that Quentin and Shreve's 1910 narrative that reconstructs Charles Bon as abandoned Haitian son must be recognized as a vital part of emerging paternalist discourse that came to justify and maintain American imperialism in Haiti. Just as U.S. Marines and ordinary American citizens were taught to imagine poor black island nation as an orphan in need of adult male guidance, Quentin and Shreve visualize Haiti as a deserted son who craves nothing more than American father's paternal recognition. When read in context of U.S. imperialism, Absalom! clearly dramatizes America's paternalist ideology regarding Haiti and emerges as a significant text in culture of early twentieth-century U. …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call