Abstract
ABSTRACT In this paper, I define and apply M. Halliday’s interpersonal metafunction methodology, a socio-linguistic approach to language known as Systemic Functional Linguistics, to an analysis of the dialogue between Nehemiah, son of Hakaliah, and Artaxerxes, King of Persia, in Neh 2,2-8. My purpose is to discover some truths concerning the social dynamics that exist between Nehemiah and Artaxerxes to inevitably uncover who, that being the governing discourse participant, is responsible for and/or holds in his control Judah’s restoration. To accomplish this task, I conduct both a mirco- and macro-level analysis of the designated corpus. In the end, the data reveals that Artaxerxes is the governing discourse participant though Nehemiah dominates the discourse by saying more. However, taking the greater co-text and context of Nehemiah into consideration, specifically Nehemiah’s prayer of chapter 1, there is potentially a third unmentioned discourse participant who could well be the one governing the result of the present dialogue. This unmentioned discourse participant is invariably Yahweh.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
