Abstract

In the hand laterality task participants judge the handedness of visually presented stimuli – images of hands shown in a variety of postures and views - and indicate whether they perceive a right or left hand. The task engages kinaesthetic and sensorimotor processes and is considered a standard example of motor imagery. However, in this study we find that while motor imagery holds across egocentric views of the stimuli (where the hands are likely to be one's own), it does not appear to hold across allocentric views (where the hands are likely to be another person's). First, we find that psychophysical sensitivity, d', is clearly demarcated between egocentric and allocentric views, being high for the former and low for the latter. Secondly, using mixed effects methods to analyse the chronometric data, we find high positive correlation between response times across egocentric views, suggesting a common use of motor imagery across these views. Correlations are, however, considerably lower between egocentric and allocentric views, suggesting a switch from motor imagery across these perspectives. We relate these findings to research showing that the extrastriate body area discriminates egocentric (‘self’) and allocentric (‘other’) views of the human body and of body parts, including hands.

Highlights

  • The study of mental rotation has a long history in psychology and neuroscience

  • In the ‘hand laterality task’ participants judge the handedness of visually presented stimuli – images of hands shown in a variety of postures and views as in Figure 1 - and indicate whether they perceive a right or left hand

  • Consistent with previous studies [2,3,4,8,9], we find that response times to judge handedness increase with angle of rotation from 0u, and show sharp increases near 180u

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of mental rotation has a long history in psychology and neuroscience. In 1971 Shepard and Metzler showed that response times to match a pair of three-dimensional shapes – where one is rotated in depth relative to the other - increase linearly with the angle of rotation between the shapes [1]. Response times are symmetric about 180u, being roughly equal for clockwise and counter-clockwise rotations of the same magnitude. This pattern suggests an analog representation: an internal visual image that is mentally rotated in the same way that a real object is physically rotated in space. Response times show a marked non-linearity in this task, increasing more rapidly the further the stimulus is rotated from 0u, and are asymmetric about 180u for many postures. This chronometric signature suggests the engagement of kinesthetic and sensorimotor processes [2,3,4]. The internal image is a motor image of one’s own hand that is mentally rotated into the stimulus posture, in the same way that a real hand is physically rotated in space

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call