Abstract
Abstract We present the first results of a large project concerned with the mutual intelligibility between Zazaki and Kurmanji dialects spoken in Eastern Anatolia. There is an ongoing debate on the classification of Kurmanji and Zazaki as separate languages or as dialects of the same language, Kurdish. However, there is no scientific study of how well speakers of Zazaki and other dialects of Kurdish can understand each other. In this paper, we present the results of a pilot investigation where we tested the mutual intelligibility of 69 Kurmanji and Zazaki participants by means of a word translation task and asked the participants to estimate how well they could understand the other language variety. The results showed that overall the mutual intelligibility was rather low. There was a significant interaction between the effects of gender and language. Zazaki males identified more words correctly than Kurmanji males while Kurmanji females had higher intelligibility scores than Zazaki females. We suggest linguistic (lexical) and non-linguistic (attitudes and amount of exposure) explanations for the intelligibility results. We also have a closer look at the intelligibility of individual words to gain a greater understanding of the reasons for the asymmetric intelligibility results.
Highlights
Turkey is a large country with a rich history, which is reflected in the linguistic diversity among its inhabitants
We present the first results of a large project concerned with the mutual intelligibility between Zazaki and Kurmanji dialects spoken in Eastern Anatolia
We present the results of a pilot investigation where we tested the mutual intelligibility of 69 Kurmanji and Zazaki participants by means of a word translation task and asked the participants to estimate how well they could understand the other language variety
Summary
Turkey is a large country with a rich history, which is reflected in the linguistic diversity among its inhabitants. There is a large number of local and minority languages, including Arabic, Albanian, Armenian, Bosnian, Circassian, Georgian, Hamsyn, Judea, Kurmanji, Laz, Pomak, Romaic, Syriac, and Zazaki (Buran and Yüksel Çak 2012; Simons and Fennig 2017; Uzun 2012). These languages belong to different language families and according to Ethnologue (EGIDS1) many of them have very few speakers in Turkey and the numbers of users are decreasing. Since so far there is no clear linguistically based study dealing with the position of the two languages, we aim to contribute to the discussion regarding the relationship between Kurmanji and Zazaki with the present study
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
