Abstract
We address whether mutual funds act effectively through the proxy voting process by supporting wealth increasing items. We examine 212,620 voting decisions made by 1,794 mutual funds from 94 fund families for 1,047 shareholder proposals voted on between July 2003 and June 2005. We find that mutual funds vote more affirmatively for wealth increasing proposals and that funds’ voting approval rates for these beneficial resolutions are significantly higher than those of other investors. Additionally, fund families do not appear to vote uniformly for proposal types and funds may not always vote consistently within fund families with the characteristics of the fund influencing its role as monitor. Funds also support proposals targeting firms with weak governance. Finally, fund voting approval rates significantly impact whether a proposal passes and whether one is implemented. Our findings provide support for mutual funds being effective monitors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
