Abstract
Despite increasing attention given to mutual forbearance strategies (MFS), researchers have virtually ignored the internal arrangements necessary for their implementation. We argue that the design of the mutual forbearance competitor may pose some unique implementation challenges for the firm, theorize about the administrative mechanisms that we expect to characterize firms implementing MFS, and suggest that, to the extent that future researchers do not model the qualities theoretically necessary to implement MFS, the full competitive consequences of MFS will not be appreciated.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
