Abstract

The present paper investigates the question of whether right-libertarians must accept easements by necessity. Since easements by necessity limit the property rights of the owner of the servient tenement, they apparently conflict with the libertarian homestead principle, according to which the person who first mixes his labor with the unowned land acquires absolute ownership thereof. As we demonstrate in the paper, however, the homestead principle understood in such an absolutist way generates contradictions within the set of rights distributed on its basis. In order to avoid such contradictions, easements by necessity must be incorporated into the libertarian theory of property rights and the homestead principle must be truncated accordingly.

Highlights

  • In the present paper, we confront the question of whether right-libertarians1 must embrace easements by necessity

  • Since easements by necessity limit the property rights of the owner of the servient tenement, they apparently conflict with the libertarian homestead principle, according to which the person who first mixes his labor with the unowned land acquires absolute ownership thereof

  • We will proceed in the following order: in the first section below we will deal with problems that beset homesteading of the virgin land; we will focus on cases involving landlocked estates; in the last section we will discuss the reason given by Walter Block for limiting easements by necessity exclusively to the cases of homesteading

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We confront the question of whether right-libertarians must embrace easements by necessity. As pointed out by Frank van Dun, even if we admit, as right-libertarians do, that homesteading vests people with the absolute property rights to surround a given person on his estate, it would yet be “absurd to regard their actions as respectful of his freedom, if by refusing him a right of way they turn encirclement into imposed isolation and his property into prison (if he is on his property) or into an inaccessible resource (if he is not).” whether it would be absurd or not obviously depends on the theory of liberty presupposed by right-libertarians. We will proceed in the following order: in the first section below we will deal with problems that beset homesteading of the virgin land; we will focus on cases involving landlocked estates; in the last section we will discuss the reason given by Walter Block for limiting easements by necessity exclusively to the cases of homesteading

The Problem of Homesteading
The Problem of Landlocked Property
The Problem of Positive Rights
Conclusions
A Debate Over Rights
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.