Abstract

Ever since the philologist Karl Lachmann, in the last century, announced the startling results of his investigations into the texts of the New Testament and the Classical Latin poet Lucretius, textual critics have sought to apply his principle of common error to establish the genealogical relationships of the sources of a wide variety of texts.' Lachmann's method arose from the problem of dealing with a text that was central to the fabric of Western Civilization, the New Testament. In its witnesses, as in those of all texts, he found three types of readings: good readings, places where the witnesses offered variant reasonable readings, and clear errors. (The following discussion naturally pertains to both printed and manuscript sources. To avoid cumbersome locutions like scribal/ typographical, or scribe/typesetter/engraver, I have chosen to use scribe or scribal to stand for the various possibilities.) The

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.