Abstract

This article examines a recent judgement in an Australian Federal Court case involving three Australian Universities and representatives of the Music Industry. From a forensic computing perspective, this case is of concern because of how the judgement reveals serious flaws in understanding amongst all participants in the case over the nature of digital evidence and how it should be best collected, analysed and presented. More broadly, the judgement also appears to have worrying implications for individual privacy and data protection. In this context, this article reviews the case and explores the approaches of the three parties involved – applicants, respondents and federal court judge. The article considers the implications of this case for the forensic computing domain and highlights the need for the development of standard frameworks for the conduct of forensic computing investigations. In this regard, the article concludes by briefly presenting the framework proposed by the European project ‘CTOSE’ (Cyber Tools On-line Search for Evidence).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.