Abstract

Memorial museums are frequently established within transitional justice projects intended to reckon with recent political violence. They play an important role in enabling young people to understand and remember a period of human rights abuses of which they have no direct experience. This paper examines the impact of a memorial museum in Romania which interprets the human rights abuses of the communist period (1947–1989). It uses focus groups with 61 young adults and compares the responses of visitors and non-visitors to assess the impact of the museum on views about the communist past, as well as the role of the museum within post-communist transitional justice. The museum had a limited impact on changing overall perceptions of the communist era but visiting did stimulate reflection on the differences between past and present, and the importance of long-term remembrance; however, these young people were largely skeptical about the museum’s role within broader processes of transitional justice. The paper concludes that it is important to recognize the limits of what memorial museums can achieve, since young people form a range of intergenerational memories about the recent past which a museum is not always able to change.

Highlights

  • In recent decades, issues of memory, remembrance and memorialization have become central themes within social science research and “memory studies” is an established interdisciplinary field [1]

  • The contribution of memorial museums to transitional justice project is, an issue which requires further investigation. This paper examines this issue with reference to a memorial museum in Romania which interprets the repression and hardship of authoritarian communist rule (1947–1989)

  • We introduce an empirical study of how young Romanians respond to the museum

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Issues of memory, remembrance and memorialization have become central themes within social science research and “memory studies” is an established interdisciplinary field [1]. Underpinning this development is a recognition that memory and remembering are as much social as individual practices. Much recent research takes Maurice Halbwachs’ concept of “collective memory” [3] as its starting point and has explored the various ways in which social remembrance takes place. Associated practices of memorialization are intended to “concretize” particular ways of understanding the past in specific sites or locations such as monuments or museums [4,5]. As much about the present as the past [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call