Musculoskeletal deformities after thoracoscopic versus conventional open repair for esophageal atresia

Abstract

BackgroundThe superiority of thoracoscopic repair (TR) over conventional open repair (COR) for esophageal atresia, especially in terms of long-term outcomes, remains to be investigated. The aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term results between TR and COR group. MethodsPatients who underwent TR or COR for esophageal atresia without other predispositions to musculoskeletal deformities (2003–2016) and had been followed up for a minimum of 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Musculoskeletal deformities (e.g., scoliosis, chest wall asymmetry, and rib deformities) were mainly evaluated based on the most recent chest radiographs. ResultsNine and eight patients were included in the TR and COR groups, respectively; the mean follow-up period was 8.7 and 11.5 years, respectively (p = 0.14). These groups had similar epidemiological characteristics and rates of postoperative complications. Musculoskeletal deformities developed significantly less frequently in the TR group versus the COR group (11 % vs. 88 %, p < 0.05; scoliosis: 0 % vs. 38 %, p = 0.08; chest wall asymmetry: 11 % vs. 50 %, p = 0.14; and rib deformities: 11 % vs. 88 %, p < 0.05, respectively). ConclusionTR was associated with a decreased incidence of musculoskeletal deformities and comparable complication rates versus COR for esophageal atresia repair. TR may achieve better long-term outcomes in this setting.