Abstract

BACKGROUNDEradication of chronic tibial osteomyelitis necessitates aggressive debridement is often followed by soft tissue reconstruction. Muscular flaps are said to be more effective than non-muscular flaps for infection treatment, while fasciocutaneous and perforator flaps are considered to be less invasive and offering a better aesthetic result.METHODSIn this study, we reviewed 24 consecutive cases of chronic tibial osteomyelitis treated according to a specific protocol in a tertiary hospital. Soft tissue coverage was done with either muscular or non-muscular free flaps. Infection recurrence and complications were compared between different flap types. Additionally, we assessed the long-term functional and aesthetic results and patient’s satisfaction. RESULTSMuscular flap was used in 13 patients (13 latissimus dorsi and 1 serratus anterior) and 11 patients underwent fasciocutaneous/perforator flaps [1 anterolateral thigh flap, 4 lateral arm flaps, 5 thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flaps and 1 radial forearm flap]. Infection was resolved for 84.6% of patients in the muscular flaps group and 90.9% in the non-muscular flaps group. None of the patients with muscular flaps were satisfied with the aesthetic appearance of their reconstructed leg when compared to 83.3% of patients with non-muscular flaps. Also, a slight regain of touch sensitivity was acknowledged in the non-muscular flap group compared to the muscular. CONCLUSIONIn this study of adult chronic tibial osteomyelitis cases, we demonstrated that fasciocutaneous and perforator free flaps offer a comparable efficacy to the muscle flaps for infection treatment, with a significantly higher patient satisfaction and aesthetic result.

Highlights

  • Successful treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the adult tibia is cumbersome and expensive.[1]

  • Eradication of chronic tibial osteomyelitis necessitates aggressive debridement is often followed by soft tissue reconstruction

  • In this study, we reviewed 24 consecutive cases of chronic tibial osteomyelitis treated according to a specific protocol in a tertiary hospital

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Successful treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the adult tibia is cumbersome and expensive.[1]. Patients often present substantial comorbidities and a history of multiple previous operations that render treatment complex.[2] First publications targeting limb preservation for chronic tibial osteomyelitis cases reported a recurrence risk of 30%.3. Four key principles for optimal management of chronic osteomyelitis are established: (i) complete debridement of devascularized bone and soft tissue, (ii) adequate stabilization of the bone, (iii) targeted antibiotic therapy, and (iv) coverage with well vascularized soft tissue.[6,7] Controversies still exist concerning the type of flaps for soft tissue reconstruction. Eradication of chronic tibial osteomyelitis necessitates aggressive debridement is often followed by soft tissue reconstruction. Muscular flaps are said to be more effective than non-muscular flaps for infection treatment, while fasciocutaneous and perforator flaps are considered to be less invasive and offering a better aesthetic result. Soft tissue coverage was done with either muscular or non-muscular free flaps. We assessed the long-term functional and aesthetic results and patient’s satisfaction

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.