Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate changes of muscle recruitment and coordination following constraint-induced movement therapy, constraint-induced movement therapy plus electrical stimulation, and traditional occupational therapy in treating hand dysfunction.MethodsIn a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial, children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy were randomly assigned to receive constraint-induced movement therapy (n = 22), constraint-induced movement therapy plus electrical stimulation (n = 23), or traditional occupational therapy (n = 23). Three groups received a 2-week hospital-based intervention and a 6-month home-based exercise program following hospital-based intervention. Constraint-induced movement therapy involved intensive functional training of the involved hand during which the uninvolved hand was constrained. Electrical stimulation was applied on wrist extensors of the involved hand. Traditional occupational therapy involved functional unimanual and bimanual training. All children underwent clinical assessments and surface electromyography (EMG) at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Surface myoelectric signals were integrated EMG, root mean square and cocontraction ratio. Clinical measures were grip strength and upper extremity functional test.ResultsConstraint-induced movement therapy plus electrical stimulation group showed both a greater rate of improvement in integrated EMG of the involved wrist extensors and cocontraction ratio compared to the other two groups at 3 and 6 months, as well as improving in root mean square of the involved wrist extensors than traditional occupational therapy group (p<0.05). Positive correlations were found between both upper extremity functional test scores and integrated EMG of the involved wrist as well as grip strength and integrated EMG of the involved wrist extensors (p<0.05).ConclusionsConstraint-induced movement therapy plus electrical stimulation is likely to produce the best outcome in improving muscle recruitment and coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy compared to constraint-induced movement therapy alone or traditional occupational therapy.Trial registrationchictr.org ChiCTR-TRC-13004041

Highlights

  • Cerebral palsy (CP) refers to a group of permanent disorders that affect the development of movement and posture that occur in the developing fetal or infant brain, leading to activity limitation[1]

  • Constraint-induced movement therapy plus electrical stimulation is likely to produce the best outcome in improving muscle recruitment and coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy compared to constraint-induced movement therapy alone or traditional occupational therapy

  • While there is evidence to support the use of constraintinduced movement therapy (CIMT), CIMT with electrical stimulation and traditional occupational therapy (OT) to improve the hand function skills of children with hemiplegic CP, this study seeks to further investigate the underlying mechanism by which changes are made in muscle recruitment and activation

Read more

Summary

Methods

Single-blind, controlled trial, children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy were randomly assigned to receive constraint-induced movement therapy (n = 22), constraintinduced movement therapy plus electrical stimulation (n = 23), or traditional occupational therapy (n = 23). Three groups received a 2-week hospital-based intervention and a 6month home-based exercise program following hospital-based intervention. Constraintinduced movement therapy involved intensive functional training of the involved hand during which the uninvolved hand was constrained. Electrical stimulation was applied on wrist extensors of the involved hand. Traditional occupational therapy involved functional unimanual and bimanual training. All children underwent clinical assessments and surface electromyography (EMG) at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Surface myoelectric signals were integrated EMG, root mean square and cocontraction ratio. Clinical measures were grip strength and upper extremity functional test

Results
Conclusions
Introduction
Participants
Design
Discussion
Study limitations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call