Abstract

One of the biggest challenges facing modern society is solving excessive generation and the environmentally safe disposal of solid waste. In this context, effective management of municipal waste is required, but local authorities in many countries are constrained by limited finances and inadequate services. The decisions in the area of municipal solid waste management are not only capital intensive, but also tough from the environmental and social points of view. There is a need to develop and implement a simple, but reliable tool that will help mayors in this process. In this paper, we analyze Public Consortia of Municipalities, a basic instrument of the National Policy for Solid Waste of Brazil, a country with more than 5000 municipalities. Public Consortia is expected to reduce costs due to economies of scale and smaller demand for land. This study identifies the characteristics of Public Consortia, its advantages and disadvantages for urban solid waste management based upon the analysis of 29 Public Consortia in the Northeast, Southeast and South regions of Brazil. Through gathering of information and empirical data our analysis reveals challenges that are not being addressed and that impact in both, the formation of Public Consortia, as well as the urban solid waste management alternatives.

Highlights

  • This study identifies the characteristics of Public Consortia, its advantages and disadvantages for urban solid waste management based upon the analysis of 29 Public Consortia in the Northeast, Southeast and South regions of Brazil

  • Our investigation of 29 Public Consortia provides an empirical view of the current scenario of the Public Consortia for municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in Brazil

  • -Ensure that the shared management of services provided by consortia benefit or compensate those living in more vulnerable situations, such as those living near to dumpsites and landfills, in poor or risk locations that do not have waste collection and live with, susceptible to diseases, adverse scenic impact and reduced welfare. -Ensure that the provision of solid waste services is of similar quality to all members of the Consortia municipalities. -Include the general population affected in the process, as the surrounding community of waste transfer sites and landfills and the recycling cooperatives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the Rio Conference 92, there has been the incorporation of new priorities for sustainable solid waste management, which has directed the action of Governments, industry and society. These priorities include the reduction of waste generation, reducing final disposal on the ground, maximizing reuse, the selective collection and recycling, composting and energy recovery. In most landfills, there is no proper treatment for the slurry (toxic liquid generated by organic garbage decomposition) This condition results that toxic waste can contaminate the soil and underground water sources, while the gases produced in the decomposition process are released (Jacobi & Besen, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call