Abstract
State policies on financially distressed municipalities differ across U.S. states, with some allowing unconditional access to Chapter 9 bankruptcy (“Chapter 9 states”) and others having proactive policies in place to assist distressed municipalities (“Proactive states”). These differences significantly affect borrowing costs. In Chapter 9 states, local municipal bond yields are higher, more cyclical, and more sensitive to default events than Proactive states. Default events have a contagion effect in Chapter 9 states, but not Proactive states. Lower local borrowing costs in Proactive states come at the expense of higher state borrowing costs via higher intergovernmental revenue transfers during weak economic conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.