Abstract

Recent methodological advances in studying large scale animal movements have let researchers gather rich datasets from behaving animals. Often collected in small sample sizes due to logistical constraints, these datasets are however, ideal for multivariate explorations into behavioral complexity. In behavioral studies of domestic dogs, although automated data loggers have recently seen increasing use, a comprehensive framework to identify complex behavioral axes is lacking. Dog behavioral studies frequently rely on subjective ratings, despite demonstrable evidence that these are insufficient for identifying behavioral variables. Taking advantage of dogs’ innate running abilities and readily available GPS data loggers, we extracted latitude-longitude coordinates from running dogs in a large field setup. By extracting multiple variables from each logged coordinate, we generated a complex dataset from limited numbers of dog runs. Individual variables were successful in classifying aerobic competence, social awareness, and different exploratory patterns of dogs. Multivariate analyses identified latent features in movement patterns of dogs which were primarily comprised of two behavioral axes: spatial acuity and social awareness. Individual dogs were then behaviorally classified into independent clusters through unsupervised learning. Interestingly, even though field dogs clustered primarily with each other in varying degrees of energetic exploration and handler focus, some house pets displayed moderately high exploration abilities as well. We expect our proof of principle quantitative pipeline to provide a robust framework for behavioral classification, generating case-control clusters based solely on complex behavioral axes, and greatly benefiting genetic association studies of dog behavior.

Highlights

  • Simple behaviors are often more than meets the eye, requiring multivariate and multi-level analysis to better understand function (Tinbergen, 1963)

  • Following a unique evolutionary history intertwined with humans, the majority of today’s domestic dogs show characteristic features

  • Behavioral studies of dogs generally study differences between these pre-labeled breeds, using statistical inference that attempts to describe how observed data fit into pre-characterized groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Simple behaviors are often more than meets the eye, requiring multivariate and multi-level analysis to better understand function (Tinbergen, 1963). Multivariate Analysis of Dog Behavior has seen increased use of quantitative variables (Gerencsér et al, 2013; Huber, 2013; Correia-Caeiro et al, 2020). Most of these rating scales categorize dog behavior into “prosocial” and “reactive” categories. Descriptions of self-handicapping (Bauer and Smuts, 2007) social mimicry (Palagi et al, 2018) attention getting (Horowitz, 2009), and dominance and submission (van Kerkhove, 2004; Bradshaw et al, 2009; Cordoni et al, 2016), might reflect projections by the human testers more so than emergent behaviors–as recent controversies over play bows attests (Byosiere et al, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.