Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective was to better understand how people adapt multitasking behavior when circumstances in driving change and how safe versus unsafe behaviors emerge.BackgroundMultitasking strategies in driving adapt to changes in the task environment, but the cognitive mechanisms of this adaptation are not well known. Missing is a unifying account to explain the joint contribution of task constraints, goals, cognitive capabilities, and beliefs about the driving environment.MethodWe model the driver’s decision to deploy visual attention as a stochastic sequential decision-making problem and propose hierarchical reinforcement learning as a computationally tractable solution to it. The supervisory level deploys attention based on per-task value estimates, which incorporate beliefs about risk. Model simulations are compared against human data collected in a driving simulator.ResultsHuman data show adaptation to the attentional demands of ongoing tasks, as measured in lane deviation and in-car gaze deployment. The predictions of our model fit the human data on these metrics.ConclusionMultitasking strategies can be understood as optimal adaptation under uncertainty, wherein the driver adapts to cognitive constraints and the task environment’s uncertainties, aiming to maximize the expected long-term utility. Safe and unsafe behaviors emerge as the driver has to arbitrate between conflicting goals and manage uncertainty about them.ApplicationSimulations can inform studies of conditions that are likely to give rise to unsafe driving behavior.
Highlights
Interactive technologies, such as smartphones and in-car information and entertainment systems, can serve a driver in various ways but may influence the ability to operate the vehicle safely
Multitasking strategies can be understood as optimal adaptation under uncertainty, wherein the driver adapts to cognitive constraints and the task environment’s uncertainties, aiming to maximize the expected long-term utility
One critical question for human factors research is how drivers adapt to the uncertainty associated with multitasking, given particular factors in the driving environment and elements of in-c ar interactions’ design
Summary
Interactive technologies, such as smartphones and in-car information and entertainment systems, can serve a driver in various ways but may influence the ability to operate the vehicle safely. One critical question for human factors research is how drivers adapt to the uncertainty associated with multitasking, given particular factors in the driving environment and elements of in-c ar interactions’ design. We consider the driver as a computationally rational agent operating in a task environment that constrains the said agent’s behavior, resulting in bounded optimal adaptation (Gershman et al, 2015; Howes et al, 2009; Simon, 1969). In our model, multitasking behavior emerges as adaptation to cognitive and task bounds, permitting the investigation of multitasking in various combinations of driving and in-car tasks. Multitasking strategies in driving adapt to changes in the task environment, but the cognitive mechanisms of this adaptation are not well known. Missing is a unifying account to explain the joint contribution of task constraints, goals, cognitive capabilities, and beliefs about the driving environment
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.