Multi-targeted antifolate (MTA): pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal administration in a rat model

Abstract

Aims LY 231514 or MTA is a multi-targeted antifolate which has been used as an anticancer drug. It is an analogue of folic acid which has shown antitumour activity against various malignancies, particularly mesothelioma and colon cancer. For cancers with peritoneal surfaces extension, the advantage of intraperitoneal chemotherapy over intravenous chemotherapy administration is the high drug concentration that can be achieved locally. Using a rat model, this study was designed to compare the pharmacokinetics and tissue adsorption of intraperitoneal vs intravenous MTA. Methods Sprague–Dawley rats were randomized into three groups according to dose and route of delivery of chemotherapy (10 mg/kg: intravenous; 10 mg/kg: intraperitoneal; 100 mg/kg: intraperitoneal). During the course of the experiment, peritoneal fluid and blood were sampled using a standardized protocol. At the end of the 3 hour procedure the rats were sacrificed, all urine was extracted and selected tissue samples were taken. One additional rat was studied over a 6 hour period for each group. The concentration of MTA in all samples was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results When MTA was delivered at 10 mg/kg the area under the curve (AUC) of the peritoneal fluid was significantly higher with intraperitoneal administration (10 778 μg/ml×min) compared to intravenous administration (454 μg/ml×min) (P<0.0001). This represents a 24-fold increase in exposure for tissues at peritoneal surfaces after intraperitoneal administration. The AUC ratio (AUC peritoneal fluid/AUC plasma) was 40.8 for intraperitoneal delivery as opposed to 0.014 for intravenous delivery (P=0.0063). The AUC ratio for intraperitoneal MTA at 100 mg/kg was 19.2. The half-life of MTA in the peritoneal fluid after intraperitoneal infusion was approximately 2 hours. There was a significant difference in MTA concentration in the mesenteric nodes and the abdominal wall (P=0.0036 and 0.0017) and in the kidneys (P=0.0122) when intraperitoneal and intravenous administration were compared. Other tissue samples did not demonstrate any difference in drug concentration. Conclusion These experiments demonstrated that the exposure of peritoneal surfaces to MTA is significantly increased with intraperitoneal MTA administration. Due to the high likelihood of microscopic residual disease after resection of intra-abdominal malignancies, clinical studies to evaluate intraperitoneal MTA may be indicated.