Abstract

Aiming at improving the tracking performance of the delta-generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli ( $\delta {-}\textrm {GLMB}$ ) filter, we present a one time step lagged $\delta {-}\textrm {GLMB}$ smoother in this work, which also inherently outputs targets trajectories and differs from the Probability hypothesis density (PHD), Multi-Bernoulli (MB), and Cardinalized probability hypothesis density (CPHD) smoothers that are incapable of generating target trajectories directly. Under the standard multitarget measurement likelihood and state transition kernel, we show that a $\delta {-}\textrm {GLMB}$ distributed multitarget filtering density would result in a same distributed one time step lagged multitarget smoothing density. An efficient implementation of the proposed smoothing algorithm using the standard ranked assignment technique is also given. Numerical results show that the proposed smoother is capable of tracking a time-varying number of targets, in the presence of measurement origin uncertainty, target detection uncertainty, and clutter, and show that the proposed smoother outperforms the $\delta {-}\textrm {GLMB}$ filter, and the PHD, MB, and CPHD smoothers of the same time lag on both the estimates of target number and state and it also outperforms the LMB and the approximated $\delta {-}\textrm {GLMB}$ smoothers of the same time lag on target number estimate.

Highlights

  • The objective of multitarget tracking (MTT) is to estimate the number of targets and their states jointly using measurements provided by sensors, such as radar, sonar, and infrared [1], [2]

  • We first show that the one time step lagged multitarget smoothing can be achieved in a way resembles the measurement update of the Bayes multitarget filter [17], and we show that a δ-GLMB distributed multitarget filtering density would results in a same distributed one time step lagged multitarget smoothing density

  • Simulation results show that the proposed smoother outperforms the δ-GLMB filter, and the Probability hypothesis density (PHD) [28], MB [30] and Cardinalized probability hypothesis density (CPHD) [31] smoothers of the same time lag on both the estimates of target number and state, and compared to the labeled multi-Bernoulli (LMB) and δ-GLMB-A smoothers of the same time lag, the proposed smoother provides similar performance on estimate of target state, yet better estimate on target number

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The objective of multitarget tracking (MTT) is to estimate the number of targets and their states jointly using measurements provided by sensors, such as radar, sonar, and infrared [1], [2]. They are multiple hypothesis tracking (MHT) [8], joint probabilistic data association (JPDA) [9], and random finite set (RFS) [7]. Given state space X, discrete label space L, and projection L : X × L → L, a finite subset X of X × L is a labeled RFS if and only if X and its label set LX = {L(x, )}(x, )∈X, where L(x, ) = , have equal cardinality [16]. We denote compactly the distinct label indicator introduced in [16] to ensure the uniqueness of the labels in a labeled RFS as X = δ|(X|L| X|), where | · | represents the cardinality of a set

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.