Abstract
Abstracttrans‐[(η5‐C5H5)Fe(η5‐C5H4‐η1‐C≡C)Ru(C≡C‐4‐C6H4NPh2)(dppe)2] [4; dppe = 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane] and trans,trans,trans‐[{(η5‐C5H5)Fe(η5‐C5H4‐η1‐C≡C)Ru(dppe)2(C≡C‐4‐C6H4)}3N] (7) have been synthesized from trans‐[Ru(C≡C‐4‐C6H4NPh2)Cl(dppe)2] (3) and trans,trans,trans‐[{(dppe)2ClRu(C≡C‐4‐C6H4)}3N] (6), respectively, and the identities of trans‐[Ru(C=CH‐4‐C6H4NPh2)Cl(dppe)2][PF6] (2, precursor to 3), 3, and 4 have been confirmed crystallographically. Chemical oxidation of 4 and 7 afforded the isolable mixed‐valence species 4[PF6] and 7[PF6]3. The CV of 4 reveals sequential loss of three electrons in fully reversible oxidation steps, whereas the CV of 7 shows five reversible redox waves; in contrast, oxidation of the precursor amines HC≡C‐4‐C6H4NPh2 and (HC≡C‐4‐C6H4)3N are irreversible processes. All oxidation processes afford reversible changes in the linear optical properties. Complementary time‐dependent density functional theory (TD‐DFT) studies suggest that the initial oxidation process for 4 and 7 is iron‐centered and is followed by one (for 4) or three (for 7) ruthenium‐centered oxidations. The final reversible oxidation is assigned by TD‐DFT as delocalized along the metalla‐ethynylarylamine moiety. The intense optical changes consequent on reversible oxidation, together with their charge‐transfer character, suggest that 4 and 7 have potential as nonlinear as well as linear optical multistate switches.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.