Abstract
AbstractCapture–mark–recapture methods have been extensively used to estimate abundance, demography, and life history parameters of populations of several taxa. However, the high mobility of many species means that dedicated surveys are logistically complicated and expensive. Use of opportunistic data may be an alternative, if modeling takes into account the inevitable heterogeneity in capture probability from imperfect detection and incomplete sampling, which can produce significant bias in parameter estimates. Here, we compare covariate‐based open Jolly‐Seber models (POPAN) and multi‐state open robust design (MSORD) models to estimate demographic parameters of the sperm whale population summering in the Azores, from photo‐identification data collected opportunistically by whale‐watching operators and researchers. The structure of the MSORD also allows for extra information to be obtained, estimating temporary emigration and improving precision of estimated parameters. Estimates of survival from both POPAN and MSORD were high, constant, and very similar. The POPAN model, which partially accounted for heterogeneity in capture probabilities, estimated an unbiased super‐population of ~1470 whales, with annual abundance showing a positive trend from 351 individuals (95% CI: 234–526) in 2010 to 718 (95% CI: 477–1082) in 2015. In contrast, estimates of abundance from MSORD models that explicitly incorporated imperfect detection due to temporary emigration were less biased, more precise, and showed no trend over years, from 275 individuals (95% CI: 188–404) in 2014 to 367 (95% CI: 248–542) in 2012. The MSORD estimated short residence time and an even‐flow temporary emigration, meaning that the probability of whales emigrating from and immigrating to the area was equal. Our results illustrate how failure to account for transience and temporary emigration can lead to biased estimates and trends in abundance, compromising our ability to detect true population changes. MSORD models should improve inferences of population dynamics, especially when capture probability is low and highly variable, due to wide‐ranging behavior of individuals or to non‐standardized sampling. Therefore, these models should provide less biased estimates and more accurate assessments of uncertainty that can inform management and conservation measures.
Highlights
Application of capture–mark–recapture (CMR) methods to estimate life history parameters from photo-identification data of naturally marked individuals has been extensively used on several taxa, such as cetaceans (Hammond et al 1990), manatees (Langtimm et al 2004), sharks (Arzoumanian et al 2005), and a variety of felids (Broekhuis and Gopalaswamy 2016)
We explored the potential of POPAN models to account for transience and temporary emigration by modeling survival and capture probabilities as a function of previous capture histories (PriorCapL; Cooch and White 2017)
Lack of fit was due to significant heterogeneity in survival probabilities (Test 3: P = 0.000) in agreement with the high proportion of transients found in the data, but not in capture probabilities (Test 2: P = 0.181)
Summary
Application of capture–mark–recapture (CMR) methods to estimate life history parameters from photo-identification data of naturally marked individuals has been extensively used on several taxa, such as cetaceans (Hammond et al 1990), manatees (Langtimm et al 2004), sharks (Arzoumanian et al 2005), and a variety of felids (Broekhuis and Gopalaswamy 2016). In the case of longlived species, sampling over multiple years is usually required to efficiently estimate survival or recruitment. Such effort is expensive and logistically demanding. Differences in movement patterns and site fidelity among individual animals over time can lead to heterogeneous capture probabilities, violating the standard assumptions of conventional models (Kendall et al 1997). Heterogeneity may arise from the uneven distribution of survey effort, if individuals are more likely to be detected at some locations and times than others which may be exacerbated in opportunistic sampling. Ignoring individual heterogeneity in capture probability can affect accuracy and precision of CMR estimates and may result in false trends being observed (Pfaller et al 2013, Sanders and Trost 2013)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
