Abstract

Linking arbitrary shapes (e.g., circles, squares, and triangles) to personal labels (e.g., self, friend, or stranger) or reward values (e.g., £18, £6, or £2) results in immediate processing benefits for those stimuli that happen to be associated with the self or high rewards in perceptual matching tasks. Here we further explored how social and reward associations interact with multisensory stimuli by pairing labels and objects with tones (low, medium, and high tones). We also investigated whether self and reward biases persist for multisensory stimuli with the label removed after an association had been made. Both high reward stimuli and those associated with the self, resulted in faster responses and improved discriminability (i.e., higher d’), which persisted for multisensory stimuli even when the labels were removed. However, these self- and reward-biases partly depended on the specific alignment between the physical tones (low, medium, and high) and the conceptual (social or reward) order. Performance for reward associations improved when the endpoints of low or high rewards were paired with low or high tones; meanwhile, for personal associations, there was a benefit when the self was paired with either low or high tones, but there was no effect when the stranger was associated with either endpoint. These results indicate that, unlike reward, social personal associations are not represented along a continuum with two marked endpoints (i.e., self and stranger) but rather with a single reference point (the self vs. other).

Highlights

  • IntroductionWork on this topic grew out of the cognitive linguistic theory of conceptual metaphor put forward by Lakoff and Johnson (1980, 1999)

  • To what extent are judgments concerning abstract concepts such as power, morality, or the self based on concrete, akin to perceptual, representations? Early work on this topic grew out of the cognitive linguistic theory of conceptual metaphor put forward by Lakoff and Johnson (1980, 1999)

  • MT Stranger = Stranger associated with medium tone), while the assignment of the low and high tones to the remaining labels was counterbalanced across participants within each group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Work on this topic grew out of the cognitive linguistic theory of conceptual metaphor put forward by Lakoff and Johnson (1980, 1999). These researchers argued that many metaphors operate by mapping abstract concepts into more concrete concepts, reflecting basic physical properties of the world. Multisensory Self and Reward Biases been observed with both visual stimuli (Dehaene et al, 1993; Fias et al, 2001; Fischer, 2003; Nuerk et al, 2004) and across vision and audition (e.g., Rusconi et al, 2006) Such abstract representations can extend to self-biases and monetary rewards. It is unknown how perceptual representation influences such conceptual hierarchies of the self and rewards

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.