Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that the vision of lip movements can alter the perception of auditory speech syllables (McGurk effect). While there is ample evidence for integration of text and auditory speech, there are only a few studies on the orthographic equivalent of the McGurk effect. Here, we examined whether written text, like visual speech, can induce an illusory change in the perception of speech sounds on both the behavioural and neural levels. In a sound categorization task, we found that both text and visual speech changed the identity of speech sounds from an /aba/‐/ada/ continuum, but the size of this audiovisual effect was considerably smaller for text than visual speech. To examine at which level in the information processing hierarchy these multisensory interactions occur, we recorded electroencephalography in an audiovisual mismatch negativity (MMN, a component of the event‐related potential reflecting preattentive auditory change detection) paradigm in which deviant text or visual speech was used to induce an illusory change in a sequence of ambiguous sounds halfway between /aba/ and /ada/. We found that only deviant visual speech induced an MMN, but not deviant text, which induced a late P3‐like positive potential. These results demonstrate that text has much weaker effects on sound processing than visual speech does, possibly because text has different biological roots than visual speech.

Highlights

  • Experienced readers automatically and effortlessly associate letters with speech sounds

  • In a sound categorization task, we found that both text and visual speech changed the identity of speech sounds from an /aba/-/ada/ continuum, but the size of this audiovisual effect was considerably smaller for text than visual speech

  • This study examined, at the behavioural and neural levels, whether written text – just like visual speech – evokes a change in sound identity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Experienced readers automatically and effortlessly associate letters with speech sounds. This ability suggests that letters and speech sounds are not processed in isolation, but at some processing stage are combined into a coherent multisensory representation. Behavioural evidence for a coupling between letters and speech sounds comes from studies showing that degraded speech is perceived as more clearly when presented together with written text (Frost & Katz, 1989; Sohoglu et al, 2014). In studies by Keetels et al (2016) and Bonte et al (2017), an ambiguous speech sound halfway between /aba/ and /ada/ was coupled repeatedly with text (‘aba’ or ‘ada’). In an auditory-only post-test following this adaptation phase, it appeared that text had shifted the interpretation of the ambiguous sound

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call