Abstract
Coaxial atomization is an established atomization strategy for many stationary combustion systems. While modeling spray formation in coaxial atomization is challenging due to the existence of a wide range of length and time scales, typical models introduce a substantial uncertainty for Euler–Lagrange simulations of the actual application, e.g., a spray flame. To reduce uncertainties, a recently proposed multiscale approach is adopted for simulations of realistic applications in this work. The multiscale approach uses three one-way coupled simulation domainss that cover the internal nozzle flow, the interfacial flow of the near-field, and the dispersed flow of the far-field. The capabilities of the approach are explored by applying it to a standardized non-reacting experiment from the flame spray pyrolysis research community. In order to assess the relevance for application simulations, results are discussed in the context of mixture formation. The results are compared against shadowgraphy images of the near-field and measured droplet statistics in the far-field. It is found that the multiscale approach is capable of providing similarly accurate droplet statistics as experiments or models derived from them. In addition, it is found that the breakup dynamics in the near-field introduce substantial mixture fraction fluctuations. These fluctuations are only included because of the deterministic coupling of the multiscale approach and are typically neglected in conventional approaches.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.