Abstract

(1) The management of agricultural landscapes for pest suppression requires a thorough understanding of multiple determinants controlling their presence. We investigated the ecological preferences of indigenous parasitoids and their drosophilid hosts to understand the role of native parasitoids as biological control agents of the invasive frugivorous Drosophila suzukii. (2) Using data from an extensive field survey across different habitat types we analyzed the influence of abiotic and biotic factors on parasitoid and drosophilid communities at multiscale levels. (3) Eight parasitoid and 27 drosophilid species were identified. Thirty-four percent variation in drosophilid communities was explained by factors at the landscape scale, and 52% of significant variation of parasitoids by local distribution of three drosophilid species, mainly collected in woodland. Parasitoid communities were significantly influenced by microhabitat type (ground versus canopy) rather than habitat type. All parasitoids except Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae preferred the ground microhabitat. All parasitoids, with the exception of Trichopria drosophilae and Spalangia erythromera, displayed significant preferences among the drosophilid species used in the baited traps. (4) Since they can tolerate a broad range of habitat factors, altogether pupal parasitoids investigated in this study could play a role in biological control programs to suppress D. suzukii, but non-target effects have to be regarded.

Highlights

  • Parasitoids, i.e., insects that develop in or on another arthropod thereby causing its death, are among the most important organisms in biological control [1]

  • (4) Since they can tolerate a broad range of habitat factors, altogether pupal parasitoids investigated in this study could play a role in biological control programs to suppress D. suzukii, but non-target effects have to be regarded

  • A high proportion of parasitoid community variation was explained by the presence of three species of Drosophilidae (D. kuntzei, D. tristis, and D. funebris) associated with two specialist parasitoids, A. tabida and L. heterotoma

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Parasitoids, i.e., insects that develop in or on another arthropod thereby causing its death, are among the most important organisms in biological control [1]. Host–parasitoid associations are structured by genetic and physiological interactions among the species that are influenced by environmental conditions [2,3]. It has been shown that environment-mediated effects on host–parasitoid interactions strongly affect species competition within and among trophic levels [4]. Parasitoids need various resources such as hosts, alternative food sources, suitable microclimate, and refuges [5]. In the crop environment those needs may not be fulfilled in all locations and at all times and the presence of semi-natural (SNH) and remnant habitats (RH, undisturbed natural area) may enhance pest control [6,7]. Alternative hosts may sustain parasitoid populations outside of the cropping season or sheltered conditions are necessary for overwintering [8]. Higher persistence and Insects 2020, 11, 334; doi:10.3390/insects11060334 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call