Abstract

We evaluate several multiple time step MTS molecular . dynamics MD methods with respect to their suitability for protein dynamics simulations. In contrast to the usual check of conservation of total energy or comparisons of trajectory details, we chose a problem-oriented approach and selected a set of relevant observables computed from extended test simulations. We define relevance of observables with respect to their role in the description of protein function. Accordingly, the use of quantities that exhibit chaotic behavior, like trajectory details, is shown to be inappropriate for the sake of the evaluation of methods. The accuracy of a cutoff method and of six MTS methods is evaluated, which differ in their treatment of the computationally crucial long-ranged Coulomb interactions. For each of the observables considered, the size of purely statistical fluctuations is determined to allow identification of algorithmic artifacts. The obtained ranking of the considered MD methods differs significantly from that obtained by the usual measures of algorithmic accuracy. One particular distance class method, DC-1d, is shown to be clearly superior in that no algorithmic artifacts were detected. Q 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 19: 1534)1552, 1998

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.