Multiple sulfur sources for the volcanic hosted massive sulfides in Betul Belt, Central India: Evidence from the sulfide ore chemistry and sulfur isotope geochemistry

Abstract

This work provides an overview of the geological, petrological, and geochemical data available on the three volcanic-hosted massive sulfides (VHMS) deposits (Ghisi, Biskhan, and Jangaldehri) in Betul Belt, Central Indian Tectonic Zone. Sulfur isotope geochemistry was used for the first time from the Betul Belt to constrain the source of sulfur for a better understanding of the ore genesis process. Mineralization is hosted in a felsic dominant bimodal volcano-sedimentary sequence associated with syn-genetic hydrothermal alteration, i.e., intense Mg–Ca alteration (actinolite-tremolite-anthophyllite) and Al–Fe alteration zone (gahnite-garnet-biotite-staurolite) followed by regional metamorphism. Field observations, drill core logging, and petrography studies reveal different modes of mineralization, i.e., dissemination, stringers, and semi-massive sulfides vein, comprises of chalcopyrite, sphalerite, pyrite, galena with lesser pyrrhotite, are paragenetically distinct in three deposits. The petrography, SEM-EPMA studies show the presence of chalcopyrite disease in Fe-rich sphalerite at Biskhan and Jangaldehri in the east and absence of the same texture at Ghisi in the west. This difference reveals the variable physio-chemical nature of the hydrothermal fluid and partial melting of sulfides during subsequent metamorphism.Cu–Fe mineralization was deposited from high-temperature hydrothermal fluids with less sulfur activity at Biskhan-Jangaldehri. Later Zn–Cu–Pb mineralization was formed from lower temperature hydrothermal fluids with higher sulfur activity. The δ34S values of sulfides (sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and pyrite) from three deposits show a wide range of sulfur values (δ34S) from −12.87 to + 19.31‰ (n = 27), consistent with heterogeneous sourcing of S, probably combining magmatic source along with the reduction of seawater sulfate. Variation in the sulfur isotopic compositions of sulfide was the result of dilution and cooling of the metalliferous fluid at different stages after interaction with meteoric, seawater and hydrothermal fluids, which caused the deposition of base metal sulfides.Sulfides from Ghisi in the west display both +ve and −ve values (−12.88 to + 0.38‰; n = 10), suggest sulfur predominantly derived by thermochemical reduction of seawater sulfate with minor input of magmatic sulfur reduction lead to polymetallic Zn–Cu–Pb mineralization. The gradual increasing in the δ34S values (more + ve values +18.65 to +19.31‰; n = 8) from west to east at Biskhan and Jangaldehri (+ 5.01 to + 8.3‰, n = 9) may be due to involvement of both the leaching of igneous basement rocks and chemical process of seawater sulfates by thermochemical reduction (TSR) from deep water levels lead to Zn–Cu mineralization. This δ34S variation occurs in three deposits of the Betul Belt due to modifications of the primary mineralization during subsequent stages of ore formation and metamorphism, indicating a complex fluid evolution history for VHMS deposits in Betul Belt, Central India, where S derived from a heterogeneous source by multiple geological processes. This situation is more akin to many established VHMS deposits of ancient and modern submarine hydrothermal systems.