Abstract

Clinical studies that involve the recording of two or more distinct and well-defined events on each subject give rise to multiple event data. Treatment comparisons are usually reported in univariate analyses of time to first event or number of events observed. However, this approach may not uncover the 'full story' of the treatment effect; moreover, it may be inefficient because it does not make full use of the available data. There are a number of published statistical methods for analysing multiple event data. Using data from a real life example, this paper compares the results obtained using the 'older ad hoc' methods with those based on the more recent methods that utilize the multiplicity of the data.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.