Abstract

Interaction with other sensory information is important for prediction of tactile events. Recent studies have reported that the approach of visual information toward the body facilitates prediction of subsequent tactile events. However, the processing of tactile events is influenced by multiple spatial coordinates, and it remains unclear how this approach effect influences tactile events in different spatial coordinates, i.e., spatial reference frames. We investigated the relationship between the prediction of a tactile stimulus via this approach effect and spatial coordinates by comparing ERPs. Participants were asked to place their arms on a desk and required to respond tactile stimuli which were presented to the left (or right) index finger with a high probability (80%) or to the opposite index finger with a low probability (20%). Before the presentation of each tactile stimulus, visual stimuli approached sequentially toward the hand to which the high-probability tactile stimulus was presented. In the uncrossed condition, each hand was placed on the corresponding side. In the crossed condition, each hand was crossed and placed on the opposite side, i.e., left (right) hand placed on the right (left) side. Thus, the spatial location of the tactile stimulus and hand was consistent in the uncrossed condition and inconsistent in the crossed condition. The results showed that N1 amplitudes elicited by high-probability tactile stimuli only decreased in the uncrossed condition. These results suggest that the prediction of a tactile stimulus facilitated by approaching visual information is influenced by multiple spatial coordinates.

Highlights

  • Interaction with other sensory information is important for tactile processing

  • We investigated the relationship between the prediction of a tactile stimulus facilitated by this approach effect and the crossing-the-hands effect using the paradigm of these studies

  • Participants were required to respond to tactile stimuli which were presented to the left index finger with a high probability (80%) or to the opposite index finger with a low probability (20%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interaction with other sensory information is important for tactile processing. Physical contact with dangerous objects often hurts our body. T. Kimura / Multisensory Research 34 (2021) 531–551 avoid dangerous objects and protect our bodies by predicting ‘where’, ‘when’, and ‘what’ tactile events will occur prior to contact; predicting these events is difficult in the tactile modality, because tactile sensation is evoked after physical contact has occurred. It is thought that the prediction of tactile events is enabled by using other sensory information. Many studies have reported that visual information influences the processing of subsequent tactile sensation (for a review, see Spence, 2010)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call