Multiple Resistance in the Larger House FlyMusca domesticain Germany

Abstract

Populations of the housefly Musca domestica isolated from farms in different German districts with strong resistance problems were compared to laboratory strains with varying resistance spectra. Resistance against pyrethroids, organophosphates and carbamates was tested using impregnated filter papers, and by topical application using a susceptible housefly strain (origin WHO) for comparison. The multi-resistant fly strains tested had a strong resistance against these insecticide groups, ranging from 37- to >10 000-fold for organophosphates and 150- to >6600-fold for pyrethroids. The constituent enantiomer pairs of the α-cyano-pyrethroid cyfluthrin were tested, as was beta-cyfluthrin. With respect to multi-resistant fly strains, the isomers II and IV had the best activity, with LD 50 values of 0.012 and 0.014 μg per fly, respectively. In addition, different groups of insect growth regulators (juvenile hormone analogues, chitin synthesis inhibitors and one triazine derivative) were tested in a special larvicidal test. The chitin synthesis inhibitors were quite effective against multi-resistant M. domestica strains except for one strain with strong resistance against chitin synthesis inhibitors, developed after extensive treatments with benzoylphenylureas for several years. The fly strains tested were not resistant against cyromazine. Additionally, the insecticides were combined with the synergists piperonyl butoxide, tributylphosphorotrithioate (DEF) and Cibacron blue and tested against the fly strain with the strongest resistance spectrum ('Grimm') in comparison to the susceptible strain ('WHO-N'). Piperonyl butoxide had the greatest effect on the efficacy of cyfluthrin followed by Cibacron blue and DEF. In a parallel investigation with susceptible and resistant house fly strains, different enzyme activities related with resistance mechanisms were tested, e.g. glutathione S-transferase (3.5-fold) and mixed-function oxidase (2.3-fold). Implications of these results for management of insecticide resistance in M. domestica are discussed.