Abstract

Individuals are increasingly involved in more than one project team. This implies that an employee has multiple memberships in these project teams simultaneously, a phenomenon known as multiple team membership (MTM). Previous, predominantly theoretical studies have acknowledged the impacts that MTM has on performance but very scarce empirical evidence exists. The aim of this study is to provide empirical support for some of these theoretical claims using data collected from 435 team members in 85 engineering project teams in South Africa. Results show that MTM has an inverted-U shaped relationship with individual performance and a positive linear relationship with team performance. When a person is working in multiple project teams simultaneously, he/she may encounter more diverse sources of ideas across all teams and thus enhances his/her innovative performance. However, as the number of MTM increases, the negative effect of task switching and fragmented attention will negatively impact on individual performance. At the project team level, a large number of MTM in a focal team allows the team members to integrate diverse sources of knowledge and resources into the focal team. This study also found that individuals’ emotional skills and cognitive skills impact on individual performance. It is recommended to programme and project portfolio managers, who often are involve in scheduling of human resources to multiple projects, to acknowledge both the positive and negative impacts of MTM on performance. Moreover, in high MTM situations, project team members with high emotional and cognitive skills should be selected.

Highlights

  • Since the 1990s modern organisations have relied more and more on project-based structures (Whittington, Pettigrew, Peck, Fenton & Conyon, 1999)

  • Studies have shown that individuals who work in teams are often involved in more than one team at the same time (Chudoba, Wynn, Lu & WatsonManheim, 2005; O’Leary, Wooley & Mortensen, 2011) and this simultaneous involvement in multiple project teams by an individual is known as “multiple team membership” (MTM) (O’Leary et al, 2011)

  • This article contributes to closing this gap in the literature on MTM. This leads to the main research question: To what extent does MTM impact on individual and team performance? The aim of this paper is to provide empirical evidence for a number of untested hypotheses proposed by O’Leary et al (2011) regarding the impact of MTM on performance at the individual and team level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the 1990s modern organisations have relied more and more on project-based structures (Whittington, Pettigrew, Peck, Fenton & Conyon, 1999). Studies have shown that individuals who work in teams are often involved in more than one (project) team at the same time (Chudoba, Wynn, Lu & WatsonManheim, 2005; O’Leary, Wooley & Mortensen, 2011) and this simultaneous involvement in multiple project teams by an individual is known as “multiple team membership” (MTM) (O’Leary et al, 2011). Edmondson and Nembhard (2009) mention that team members need time to get acquainted with each other before they can work together effectively as a team. This implies that by being involved in multiple teams, an individual has the repeated opportunities to learn “to team-up” and to build swift trust with new members. A decrease of his/her performance may occur (Wageman, Gardner & Mortensen, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call