Abstract
BackgroundMultiple periprosthetic joint infections (MPJIs) are uncommon. We determine the prevalence of developing a second-site periprosthetic joint infection. MethodsOur institutional arthroplasty database was reviewed. Those who developed a second-site infection had a retrospective chart review to determine the pathogen, timing of infection, comorbidities, and results of treatment. ResultsThirteen of 206 (6.3%) patients at-risk for MPJI experienced a second periprosthetic joint infection. Mode of the second infection was hematogenous in 6, all of whom were being treated for the index periprosthetic joint infection. Seven secondary infections did not relate to the index infection. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 5 continued on suppressive antibiotics, and 6 successfully cleared infection. ConclusionThe prevalence of MPJI has decreased compared with previous reports.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
