Abstract
Objectives: Currently, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presenting with perisinus fat invasion (PSI) and/or perinephric fat invasion (PFI) is merged as one entity, pathological T3a (pT3a); however, the combination of PFI and PSI (PFI+PSI) may not be associated with equivalent prognosis compared with either PFI or PSI alone (PFI/PSI). Here, we analyzed the prognostic significance of PFI+PSI vs. PFI/PSI in pT3aN0–1M0–1 RCC.Method: We identified 5,290 patients with pT3aN0–1M0–1 RCC, treated by nephrectomy, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, between 2010 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine and Gray competing risks regression were fitted to assess risks of survival outcomes, respectively. 1:1 propensity score method was used to minimize differences in the covariates' distributions.Results: Among all patients, 746 patients (14.1%), 2,569 patients (48.5%) and 1,975 patients (37.3%) experienced PFI+SI, PFI, and PSI, respectively, and 3,952 patients (74.7%) without diseases of lymphnode (N1) and/or distant metastasis (M1). PFI alone compared with PSI alone showed a comparable overall survival (OS) and cancer-special survival (CSS), either PFI or PSI alone experienced a better OS and CSS than PFI+PSI. In patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC, PFI+PSI compared with the PFI/PSI was significantly associated with worse OS with hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.38 [1.12–1.69], p = 0.002 and 1.41 [1.06–1.87], p = 0.017 for unmatched data and matched data, respectively, and higher RCC-special mortality (HR [95%CI]: 1.55 [1.21–1.99], p = 0.001 and 1.70 [1.19–2.43], p = 0.004 for unmatched data and matched data, respectively). However, in pT3aN1/M1 RCC patients, PFI+PSI was not significantly associated with RCC-special mortality (HR [95%CI]: 1.02 [0.85–1.23], p = 0.800 and 0.99 [0.79–1.24], p = 0.920 for unmatched data and matched data, respectively) in comparison with PFI/PSI. In addition, invasion type was not an independent risk factor for patient's prognostication in the pT3a RCC with diseases of N1 and/or M1 (all p > 0.5).Conclusion: Multiple invasion patterns (PFI+PSI) are associated with inferior survival relative to PFI/PSI alone in patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC; however, these effects are masked in patients with metastatic disease. These results warrant consideration in the development of the next edition of the tumor-node-metastasis staging system, to improve risk stratification.
Highlights
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) published the first Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging manual in 1977 (1)
We investigated the prognostic outcomes of patients with pathological T3a (pT3a) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and found that the concomitant presence of PFI+PSI in patients with pT3aN0M0 tumors is associated with significant increases in all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) relative to PFI/PSI alone, this association was not evident in patients with lymph node invasion and/or distant metastasis
Survival relative to PFI/PSI alone in patients with non-metastatic pT3a RCC, this result was inconsistent with Shah et al study; these effects are masked in patients with metastatic disease (N1 or/and M1), which was the absence of Shah et al study
Summary
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) published the first Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging manual in 1977 (1). The TNM staging system has become the global standard for the classification of cancer. In late 2016, the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual was published, with an implementation date of 1st January 2018 for clinical practice and cancer registry reporting. Changes to the staging of kidney cancer were minimal compared with other sites within the urinary and male genital system (1, 2). The pathological T3a (pT3a) stage of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was revised extensively in the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system. In the pT3a category, the word “grossly” is used to describe the renal vein. “segmental branch extension” was removed and the “muscle-containing branches” were changed to “segmental vein.”. “segmental branch extension” was removed and the “muscle-containing branches” were changed to “segmental vein.” In addition, “invasion of the pelvicalyceal system” was added (1, 2)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
