Abstract

Consistent data demonstrates negative psychological effects of caregiving on front-line health professionals. Evidence that psychological resilience factors can help minimize distress and the potential for low-cost interventions have created interest in resilience-based development programmes; yet evidence of perceived value amongst health professionals is lacking. This study explored health professionals' experiences and perceptions of a novel, resilience-based intervention designed to pro-actively prepare staff for coping with error; to investigate their perceptions of what resilience meant to them, the relevance of the intervention, and impact of participation on ability to cope with error. Semi-structured interviews 4-6 weeks post intervention with 23 randomly selected participants from seven cohorts (midwives, paediatricians, obstetricians/gynaecologists, paramedics) and trainees (physician associates, mammographers, sonographers). Thematic analysis of interview data. Participants reported various interpretations of, and a shift in perception regarding what the concept of psychological resilience meant to them and their practice. These included for example, resilience as a positive or negative concept and their awareness and response to a range of personal, organizational and system factors influencing personal resilience. They valued the prophylactic, clinically relevant, interactive and applied nature of the intervention; having developed and applied valuable skills beyond the context of involvement in error, noting that individuals needed to be willing to explore their own coping mechanisms and human fallibility to gain maximum benefit. There was also consensus that whilst proactively developing individual level psychological resilience is important, so too is addressing the organizational and system factors that affect staff resilience which are outside individual staff control. Enhancing resilience appears to be considered useful in supporting staff to prepare for coping with error and the wider emotional burden of clinical work, but such interventions require integration into wider system approaches to reduce the burden of clinical work for health professionals.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe application of resilience training in the UK health system, to enhance health professionals' capacity for ‘absorbing any unacceptably and avoidably negative conditions’, has created distaste for the implementation of such training.[11] The potential value of resilience-based training in enabling healthcare professionals to prepare for burdens associated with clinical work is supported, but it is critical for such training to be applied only in the context of systematic solutions to tackle the burden on health professionals that is created by system inadequacies.[10,11]

  • Healthcare professionals at the clinical front-line have borne much of the burden, evident in consistent data demonstrating high levels of stress and burnout,[3,4,5] while studies have shown consistent links between these negative psychological effects and healthcare safety and quality.[6,7,8]

  • The potential value of resilience-based training in enabling healthcare professionals to prepare for burdens associated with clinical work is supported, but it is critical for such training to be applied only in the context of systematic solutions to tackle the burden on health professionals that is created by system inadequacies.[10,11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The application of resilience training in the UK health system, to enhance health professionals' capacity for ‘absorbing any unacceptably and avoidably negative conditions’, has created distaste for the implementation of such training.[11] The potential value of resilience-based training in enabling healthcare professionals to prepare for burdens associated with clinical work is supported, but it is critical for such training to be applied only in the context of systematic solutions to tackle the burden on health professionals that is created by system inadequacies.[10,11]

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.